#deadwitness ~ The Walnut Creek Bomb Squad

Marie Coon (RIP 2008)

The astounding personal connection for Pete Bennett was learning the fate of Nordstroms Tailor unlikely suicide in Lake Arrowhead. That incident documented ny the La Times and

Marie committed suicide by locking herself in the cab of a pickup truck at Lake Arrowhead with portable lighted barbecues and a pail of burning coals. She left a note, saying she wanted to be with Jimmy. She was 48.

Jimmy Coon

This story bothered me for years after learning his connection to his step mom Marie Coon. The facts are hard to collect but in 2007

Factual Error : Pete Bennett ran into a mom who attended a local club in 2007 that said her son had been killed in Iraq.
Real Statement : Jimmy’s biological mother died when he was 9 years old, eight years after his parents divorced.
Bennett has been trolled by a series of persons portraying being part of an event or connected to a specific person. It is known as being part of a cyber chess board.

FBI miscues amongst successes

This is the same FBI agent who arrived at Mainframe Designs Cabinets and Fixtures in 1989. Bennett called the San Francisco offices after endless incidents connected to the PIttsburg Police Department. Their core tactics during the 80s was prostitutes Round Up , kill drug dealers, Blacks and run racketeering protection.
In 1988 Officer Eric Bergen offered up protection from his security company which was rejected. Things only got worse from there.

The FBI Bomb Trainer

The Walnut Creek bomb squad was commissein

temporary

temporary

text_pending

Needed_Text

The Walnut Creek Bomb Squad

Created in the late 80s after the car of IRS Agent Shannon Hodges was blown up in the East Bay

Captain Steve Skinner

The structure of the Contra Costa Narcotics Enforcement Taskforce (CNET), the SWAT and Arson investigators lead to a ripe combination to go astray.

card_text

Lieutenant Steve Bertolozzi

The structure of the Contra Costa Narcotics Enforcement Taskforce (CNET), the SWAT and Arson investigators lead to a ripe combination to go astray.

card_text

---

The Roseville Train Bomb and Southern Pacific

Largely unnoticed for decades is a railyard explosion involving and destroying over 100 rail cars loaded with bombs destined for the Concord Naval Weapons station. Not long after the United States began losing the Vietnam War. Perhaps Roseville should reopen the explosion as a murder case connected to any US Service person killed after this explosion?

Safeway CEO Steve Burd

During the early 1980's Safeway store development was located just off Yganicio Valley Road and Oak Grove Road. Along the way they began contracting projects with Mainframe Designs Cabinets and Fixures owned by Pete Bennett. It was a big ad for a small shop. The ad worked very well because the unionized shops went on strike where owners cut back advertising. Stoke of luck as all Bennett knew was a run a full page ad in the Contra Costa Central Yellow Pages.

A key customer was Safeway Stores where back in the 1980s was embarking on remodeling, upgrades and store format changes. Safeway was asking for more production capicity focusing on new projects in the millions.

Southern Pacific Attorney

In the background for decades was a witness murder resulting in Pete Bennett losing Mainframe Designs Cabinet and Fixtures a potential of becoming a multimillion dollar operation.

A key customer was Safeway Stores where back in the 1980s was embarking on remodeling, upgrades and store format changes. Safeway was asking for more production capicity focusing on new projects in the millions.

Pushed or Jump?

Pete Bennett reached out to City Attorney Mark Coon when facts possible collusion related to the Concord Naval Weapons Station with information about Lennar. B

Bennett met City Attorney Mark Coon in connection to once again being accused of being transient. Few know that Bennett was driven out of business in connection the reward for San Francisco Officer Lester Garnier murdered in July 2008.

Outsourced to Suicide

The Kevin Flanagan Suicide reeks of another Contra Costa County faked suicide. This suicide mirrors the murder-suicide case of Bennett's friend Alicia Driscoll and daughter Jineva.

Pictured facing away is Pete Bennett co-organizer with Lee Perry former PacBell programer

Chief Wenzel

Tracking Wenzel's career history Bennett discovered his connection the Emmon Bodfish murder, the fatal police shooting of Jason Amen Watts by Walnut Creek Police in 1997 with allegations Watts stole a FedEx in Orinda where Wenzel was Sgt. Wenzel

xxx

xxx

xxx

xxx

The Convicted District (Felony)

Bennett attended the first news conference held at Contra Costa District Attorney Offices regarding the arrests of Commander Wielsch and PI Chris Butler before answering nearly every question Peterson looked at Bennett. Most everyone noticed the interaction. Back then Bennett wasn't timid but held back asking questions that today would be bombshells of the future.

xxx

Nancy Templeton

City of Walnut Creek Code Enforcement Officer

Bennett resident of Walnut Creek for many years moving between Concord, Pleasant Hill, Danville and Pittsburg.

Bennett was attempting to engage with the City Attorney and City Manager staff. He was on the third floor Walnut Creek City Hall where he placed his homeless backpack where chairs located in the waiting area
Templeton walks past Bennett to enter her work area. Within minutes Bennett is confronted by several police officers responding to information that his unattended property just 20 feet away was a possible bomb. Officers being sane arrive with hands on their guns placing Bennett in a scenario where he could have shot dead by pplice. That false police report helped destroy employment opportunities as Bennett once had clearance to enter Lawrence Livermore Labs, GE Nuclear and PG&E Facilities. The clearance he looks for today is the empty space in his wallet or his missing children.

The Nutshell Smells Bad, Tastes Bad leaving residents believing the City of Walnut Creek is safe

This story is almost a joke, mom turns up missing with children after fleeing Antioch in 1997. The letter to the District Attorney was accepted as gospel but nowhere did anyone state her husband was a Captain in the Walnut Creek Police Department. Sounds so similar to the 1989 Floyd Brown Jr. murder a key witness in Bennett vs. Southern Pacific. Just like Stratton there is no real history except several scant detail missing court records.

Captain Neil Stratton

xxx_comming_soon

During the many long days of digging Bennett was on FBI's web site researching missing persons section when he came upon the Elizabeth Stratton poster. Knowing most of the names of Walnut Creek employees he knew about Neil Stratton. His former girlfriend was driving a Ford Explore owned by Bob Stratton. That was around the time that Ron Verde rented Bennett a huge 3000SF house for trading for web site design. Another coincidence was at the time during summer 2008 Bennett was renting an office on Oakland Blvd. The sublessor was realtor Kevin Roberts former COmmunity Development Director for the City of Walnut Creek.

Elizabeth Stratton Missing Person

xxx_comming_soon

Details:

On December 16, 1997, Elizabeth Ann Stratton fled her Antioch, California, home with her two non-custodial children. On December 19, 1997, a letter written by Stratton arrived at the Contra Costa County District Attorney's Office stating that she had taken the children, left California, and did not want anyone to find her or the children. Stratton was in the middle of a child custody dispute with her ex-husband at the time.

Read More

Witness: Mitt Romney

 Mitt Romney 

Read More

18 U.S. Code § 1512.Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

 

729. PROTECTION OF GOVERNMENT PROCESSES -- TAMPERING WITH VICTIMS, WITNESSES, OR INFORMANTS -- 18 U.S.C. 1512

Section 1512 of Title 18 constitutes a broad prohibition against tampering with a witness, victim or informant. It proscribes conduct intended to illegitimately affect the presentation of evidence in Federal proceedings or the communication of information to Federal law enforcement officers. It applies to proceedings before Congress, executive departments, and administrative agencies, and to civil and criminal judicial proceedings, including grand jury proceedings. See 18 U.S.C. § 1515(a)(1). In addition, the section provides extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over the offenses created therein. See 18 U.S.C. § 1512(g); 128 Cong. Rec. H8469 (daily ed. Oct. 1, 1980); H. R. Rep. No. 1369, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 20-22 (1980).

The express prohibitions against tampering with witnesses and parties contained in former 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503 and 1505, are now in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of 18 U.S.C. § 1512. (As discussed in this Manual at 1724 and 1727, the omnibus clauses of these provisions still cover witnesses.) All forms of tampering with informants covered in former 18 U.S.C. § 1510, with the exception of tampering by means of bribery, are now proscribed by 18 U.S.C. §  1512(b)(3). Tampering with informants by means of bribery remains an 18 U.S.C. § 1510 offense.

Section 1512 augments the prohibitions of the former law in several important respects. First, section 1512(b)(3) sweeps more broadly than former 18 U.S.C. § 1510 and expands the class of informants protected by Federal law. For example, it protects individuals having information concerning a violation of a condition of probation, parole, or bail whether or not that violation constitutes a violation of any other Federal criminal statute. Second, it protects individuals seeking to provide information to Federal judges or Federal probation and pretrial services officers.

Section 1512 also includes attempts in its list of prohibited conduct. There is no requirement that the defendants actions have the intended obstructive effect. See, e.g., United States v. Murray, 751 F.2d 1528 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 979 (1985); United States v. Wilson, 796 F.2d 55 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1039 (1987). As amended by the Criminal Law and Procedure Technical Amendments Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-646, it is clear that the killing of a witness or attempts to kill a witness in order to prevent his/her testimony constitutes an act of force intended to "influence the witness' testimony." See 18 U.S.C. §  1512(a). This change was necessitated by one court interpreting former §  1512 as not reaching an act of attempted murder that was intended to prevent a witness from testifying. See United States v. Dawlett, 787 F.2d 771 (1st Cir. 1986).

The section specifically abolishes the pending proceeding requirement of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503 and 1505. The provision also eliminates ambiguity about the class of individuals protected. Although the former law protected witnesses, parties, and informants, it was unclear whether that law reached the intimidation of third parties (for example, the spouse of a witness) for the purpose of intimidating the principal party. Section § 1512 of Title 18 plainly covers such conduct, for it speaks of conduct directed toward "another person." See 128 Cong. Rec. H8203 (daily ed. Sept. 30, 1982).

Section 1512 protects potential as well as actual witnesses. With the addition of the words "any person," it is clear that a witness is "one who knew or was expected to know material facts and was expected to testify to them before pending judicial proceedings." United States v. DiSalvo, 631 F.Supp. 1398 (E.D. Pa. 1986), aff'd, 826 F.2d 1054 (3d Cir. 1987). Under §  1512, an individual retains his/her status as a witness even after testifying. United States v. Wilson, 796 F.2d 55 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1039 (1987) (protection of witness under § 1512 continues throughout the trial); United States v. Patton, 721 F.2d 159 (6th Cir. 1983) (witness retains status while defendant's motion for a new trial is pending); United States v. Chandler, 604 F.2d 972 (5th Cir. 1979) (witness retains status while case is pending on direct appeal). Cf. United States v. Risken, 788 F.2d 1361 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 923 (1986) (party was a witness after asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege and being dismissed from the stand since he could be recalled at any time).

Section 1512 of Title 18 contains two significant additions to the types of tampering barred by Federal law. First, it forbids "misleading conduct," as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1515. Such conduct was not covered in those circuits that had narrowly construed the omnibus clauses of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503 and 1505 under the rule of ejusdem generis. See United States v. Metcalf, 435 F.2d 754 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Essex, 407 F.2d 214 (6th Cir. 1969). see generally, 128 Cong. Rec. H8203 (daily ed. Sept. 30, 1982). Second, 18 U.S.C. § 1512 makes intentional harassment a misdemeanor. This offense is intended to reach conduct less egregious than the corrupt, threatening or forceful conduct required for a violation of former 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503 and 1505. Harassing conduct has been defined as that intended to badger, disturb or pester. Wilson, supra.

Despite its coverage, section 1512 was not intended to reach all forms of witness tampering. Its coverage is limited to tampering accomplished by the specific means enumerated in the provision. United States v. King, 762 F.2d 232 (2d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1018 (1986). The more imaginative types of witness tampering as well as forms of tampering defying enumeration were still prohibited by the omnibus provision of § 1503. United States v. Lester, 749 F.2d 1288 (9th Cir. 1984).

It is unclear whether 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3) was intended to widen the prohibition against obstructing investigations contained in former 18 U.S.C. § 1510 to include investigations that are not per se criminal in nature, such as an FAA investigation of an aircraft accident, or a Senate committee investigation of the trucking industry. A comparison of the difference in phraseology between 18 U.S.C. §§ 1510 and 1512(b)(3), however, indicates that those differences are differences of style, not substance, and that no such expansion was intended. Section 1510 proscribes interference with "the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States . . ." to a (Federal) criminal investigator; 18 U.S.C. §  1512(b)(3) proscribes interference with "the communication to a (Federal) law enforcement officer . . . of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense." There is nothing to indicate that Congress intended to depart from the generally accepted meaning of "law enforcement" as criminal law enforcement and of "offense" as criminal violation. See 18 U.S.C. § 1515(4); 128 Cong. Rec. H8203 (daily ed. Sept. 30, 1982). Accordingly, prosecutions for interference with legislative or administrative investigations that have not taken on the character of a criminal investigation should be brought under the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1505. See this Manual at 1726.

Read More

Beating Bennett to prevent his testimony in several Federal and State cases

One day at the Library

When the Gaurd attacks the County fails to react.

Acctually, One Day At Your Library, they beat Pete Bennett, yes that hurt.   Then Bad Cops arrive with guns and a corrupt judge they blown up your truck visible to the Danville Police Department   and then after that   they go to Springville Utah where they kill children.

The Strack Family Murders

Then when you can't escape relality you go after his relatives

He Paid 15 Million to the DA

He's friends with a former President

Read More